Is a Mortgage Broker Better Than a Direct Lender?

What’s the difference between a direct lender and a mortgage broker?

This question comes up very commonly and there is a lot of misinformation out there about this subject. Let’s begin with the fundamental difference. A loan officer at a bank is employed as an agent of the bank they are representing. At the end of the day, bank is selling you a product (a mortgage), and paying their sales team a commission. The borrower pays this commission to the loan officer at the bank either by paying higher fees or a higher rate so that the bank can compensate the loan officer for the sale. A broker, on the other hand, is self-employed, or works for a mortgage firm who represents the borrower and is an agent of the borrower. The broker has a fiduciary duty to perform in the borrower’s best interest, not the banks’.

A mortgage broker creates value to the banks and investors by submitting fully compliant loan packages without the investor being required to engage in sales, screening, or processing of their applicants. It lets them do what they do best, is simply provide capital in exchange for monthly interest payments.

There is a misconception, where homeowners may come under the impression that a mortgage broker is a “middle-man” or that somehow a broker must mark-up a consumer’s rate in order to earn a profit. In fact the opposite is true. A broker is almost always compensated by the investor in the form of a yield spread premium.

For example:

Bank of Hometown’s base rate to lend 30 years if no application or processing was required: 2.5%

Bank of Hometown’s rate, when originating the mortgage direct to a consumer: 3%

(the difference between the 2.5% and 3% is to earn enough to pay for the origination, commission and processing at the bank)

Bank of Hometown’s rate, when originating through wholesale channels to a licensed broker: 2.5%

(the bank will offer the real rate to the broker, because the broker will do not have to handle all the origination and processing)

The broker is able to secure a 2.5% rate commitment on the wholesale channel. With the offer to lend to the broker at 2.5%, the bank will also pay the broker an upfront rebate or other compensation for any rate above the 2.5% wholesale rate. The broker can mark up his wholesale rate of 2.5% by .25% to earn a big enough rebate to pay for expenses and make a profit, thereby delivering a 2.75% rate to the consumer at .25% less than the 3% the investor would be willing to offer had they been required to handle all originating and processing activities.

The difference, .25% to the rate,is about 100bps worth of credit given back to the consumer, who saves approximately $4,000 in an upfront credit towards any settlement costs, or $19,242 over the course of a 30 year loan on a $400,000 loan amount.

Written by Nathan Kowarsky, NMLS 294599, Vice President of E Mortgage Capital, Inc. in Irvine California. He can be reached at 949-238-6220 or at

This post was created with our nice and easy submission form. Create your post!

Share this post

What do you think?

0 points
Upvote Downvote

Written by Joseph Shalaby




/* Style Definitions */
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";

E Mortgage Capital is a premier mortgage company established November 2005. We specialize in smart financing solutions which accommodate every spectrum.


Notify of

How Cloud Computing is Revolutionising the Insurance Industry?

10 Must Have Candid Clicks In Your Wedding Album